← New Search ↗ Social Card

George Thurston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Elite 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0200 0.0214 0.0383 0.0410
2016-17 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 10 5 2 7 0.700 0.0839 0.0850 0.1607 0.1629
2017-18 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 11 4 5 9 0.818 0.1101 0.1064 0.2785 0.2691
2018-19 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 24 7 22 29 1.208 0.2593 0.2420 0.5917 0.5523
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 27 15 12 27 1.000
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 24 21 12 33 1.375
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 22 12 8 20 0.909
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2019-20 · Southern New Hampshire
+465.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24103
Forward overall
#983
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.