IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Sloan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Brampton Capitals OJHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0349 0.0366 0.0863 0.0904
2012-13 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 48 9 12 21 0.438 0.1222 0.1220 0.3019 0.3013
2013-14 Oakville Blades OJHL 54 18 32 50 0.926 0.2587 0.2450 0.6390 0.6052
2014-15 Oakville Blades OJHL 34 11 24 35 1.029 0.2876 0.2575 0.7104 0.6361
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 26 5 7 12 0.462
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 17 2 7 9 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2015-16 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+145.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15557
Forward overall
#640
Forward born in 1994
#972
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Grund
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Foulds
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Froese
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.