← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Sloan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Brampton Capitals OJHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0306 0.0321 0.0861 0.0902
2012-13 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 48 9 12 21 0.438 0.1072 0.1070 0.3012 0.3006
2013-14 Oakville Blades OJHL 54 18 32 50 0.926 0.2269 0.2149 0.6375 0.6038
2014-15 Oakville Blades OJHL 34 11 24 35 1.029 0.2523 0.2259 0.7087 0.6346
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 26 5 7 12 0.462
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 17 2 7 9 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2015-16 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+179.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20444
Forward overall
#793
Forward born in 1994
#801
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.