← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Grund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 43 15 14 29 0.674 0.0908 0.0965 0.2296 0.2441
2019-20 New England Wolves EHL 46 12 13 25 0.543 0.1166 0.1166 0.2662 0.2662
2020-21 Express Hockey Club EHL 38 13 22 35 0.921 0.1977 0.1977 0.4511 0.4511
2021-22 EHL 46 16 30 46 1.000 0.2146 0.2035 0.4897 0.4643
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Brockport D3 SR 21 3 5 8 0.381
2024-25 SUNY Brockport D3 JR 23 3 2 5 0.217
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 20 6 8 14 0.700
2022-23 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 25 6 10 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2022-23 · SUNY Brockport
+365.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21910
Forward overall
#791
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.