IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Goldman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — EHL 30 5 11 16 0.533 0.1232 0.1275 0.2609 0.2701
2016-17 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 17 1 3 4 0.235 0.0660 0.0654 0.1935 0.1917
2017-18 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 31 8 28 36 1.161 0.1519 0.1393 0.3941 0.3614
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast FR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast — 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21001
Forward overall
#952
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Haxton
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Powers
Middlebury · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Lyon
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.