← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Powers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 15 8 7 15 1.000 0.2807 0.2772 0.8222 0.8118
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 8 18 26 0.722 0.2027 0.1902 0.5938 0.5572
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Middlebury D1 NESCAC SR 24 7 15 22 0.917
2019-20 Middlebury D3 NESCAC 24 7 15 22 0.917
2018-19 Middlebury D1 NESCAC JR 25 5 6 11 0.440
2018-19 Middlebury D3 NESCAC 25 5 6 11 0.440
2017-18 Middlebury D3 NESCAC 20 6 4 10 0.500
2016-17 Holy Cross D1 AHA 10 0 1 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · Holy Cross
-48.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23374
Forward overall
#885
Forward born in 1995
#55
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Misericordia · 2022-23
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Beloit · 2024-25
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.