← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Lyon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-02-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Wellington Dukes OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2002-03 Wellington Dukes OJHL 38 4 18 22 0.579 0.1419 0.1452 0.3986 0.4079
2003-04 Wellington Dukes OJHL 47 6 14 20 0.425 0.1043 0.1020 0.2930 0.2867
2004-05 Wellington Dukes OJHL 49 8 27 35 0.714 0.1751 0.1625 0.4918 0.4563
2005-06 Wellington Dukes OJHL 47 10 41 51 1.085 0.2660 0.2370 0.7471 0.6657
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 29 6 11 17 0.586
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 23 4 8 12 0.522
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 26 3 7 10 0.385
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 27 3 6 9 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2006-07 · SUNY Oswego
+70.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4746
Defenseman overall
#701
Defenseman born in 1985
#930
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.