IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Schieber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 44 17 19 36 0.818 0.0755 0.0728 0.1874 0.1806
2017-18 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Premier 43 24 23 47 1.093 0.1430 0.1311 0.3710 0.3401
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Worcester State D1 MASCAC SO 16 2 1 3 0.188
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 16 2 1 3 0.188
2018-19 Worcester State D1 MASCAC FR 18 4 7 11 0.611
2018-19 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 18 4 7 11 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2018-19 · Worcester State
+562.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18997
Forward overall
#850
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon MacKinnon
Concordia · 2017-18
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Miles
Salem State · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Schultz
Elmira · 2018-19
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.