IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Beaudoin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 — USHL 46 5 1 6 0.130 0.0769 0.0765 0.3916 0.3896
2006-07 Chicago Steel USHL 12 3 1 4 0.333 0.1966 0.1855 1.0010 0.9445
2007-08 Southern Minnesota Express NAHL 58 28 30 58 1.000 0.3674 0.3351 1.0555 0.9627
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 27 3 3 6 0.222
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 28 6 7 13 0.464
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 29 13 10 23 0.793
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 27 5 12 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2008-09 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+167.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16766
Forward overall
#580
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Olinyk
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Kroska
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.