IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Kroska Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Mason City Toros NA3HL 48 13 38 51 1.062 0.1333 0.1340 0.3354 0.3373
2012-13 Mason City Toros NA3HL 45 23 51 74 1.644 0.2064 0.1973 0.5191 0.4962
2013-14 Mason City Toros NA3HL 47 32 90 122 2.596 0.3258 0.2987 0.8195 0.7515
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 14 1 5 6 0.429
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 8 2 1 3 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2014-15 · St. Olaf
+69.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7379
Forward overall
#314
Forward born in 1993
#38
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dominic Thomas
Hamline · 2024-25
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Cole
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Keyes
Aurora · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.