IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donny Flynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Jersey Rockets EHL 39 22 30 52 1.333 0.3080 0.3183 0.6524 0.6741
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 47 18 58 76 1.617 0.3735 0.3691 0.7912 0.7818
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 24 10 32 42 1.750
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 11 6 13 19 1.727
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC SO 27 27 24 51 1.889
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC FR 26 14 23 37 1.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.42
2018-19 · Wilkes
+376.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5282
Forward overall
#264
Forward born in 1996
#16
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2003-04
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Dimaline
Neumann · 2022-23
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.