IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Kneeland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-01-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Calgary Royals AJHL 56 8 21 29 0.518 0.1730 0.1740 0.4808 0.4836
2003-04 Calgary Royals AJHL 57 12 19 31 0.544 0.1817 0.1725 0.5049 0.4794
2004-05 Calgary Royals AJHL 63 30 46 76 1.206 0.4029 0.3634 1.1198 1.0100
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Lake Forest D3 — SR 27 11 14 25 0.926
2007-08 Lake Forest D3 — JR 26 7 11 18 0.692
2006-07 Lake Forest D3 — SO 14 7 6 13 0.929
2005-06 Lake Forest D3 — FR 28 15 25 40 1.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.43
2005-06 · Lake Forest
+481.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11975
Forward overall
#417
Forward born in 1984
#453
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Davis
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.