IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Allan Bamberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-03-11 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Luleå HF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Luleå HF U20 SuperElit 16 2 2 4 0.250 0.0987 0.1026 0.3444 0.3581
2008-09 Luleå HF U20 SuperElit 38 7 10 17 0.447 0.1765 0.1746 0.6164 0.6098
2009-10 Luleå HF U20 SuperElit 39 13 19 32 0.821 0.3238 0.3068 1.1304 1.0710
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 25 4 5 9 0.360
2013-14 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 12 3 8 11 0.917
2012-13 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 16 3 10 13 0.812
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2012-13 · Manhattanville
+273.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11345
Forward overall
#457
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Miller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Enns
Marian · 2017-18
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.