IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-01-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Dayton Gems NAHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1225 0.1300 0.3518 0.3733
2004-05 Indiana Ice USHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.1311 0.1309 0.6674 0.6664
2005-06 Indiana Ice USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Indiana Ice USHL 31 12 7 19 0.613 0.3615 0.3234 1.8408 1.6469
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA — 28 19 28 47 1.679
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.68
2010-11 · Adrian
+695.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19194
Forward overall
#654
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Resch
Manhattanville · 2001-02
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Rozak
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.100 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Dawes
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.