← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Enns Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 55 18 18 36 0.654 0.1260 0.1356 0.4125 0.4441
2016-17 MJHL 60 29 34 63 1.050 0.2021 0.2077 0.6617 0.6800
2017-18 Portage Terriers MJHL 27 15 16 31 1.148 0.2210 0.2164 0.7235 0.7084
2018-19 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 34 11 34 45 1.323 0.3391 0.3174 0.9808 0.9181
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA 30 21 27 48 1.600
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA 31 20 25 45 1.452
2020-21 Marian D1 SO 19 13 10 23 1.210
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA 19 13 10 23 1.210
2019-20 Marian D1 FR 26 11 13 24 0.923
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA 26 11 13 24 0.923
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2019-20 · Marian
+289.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11879
Forward overall
#543
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arcadia · 2021-22
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.