| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Lone Star Cavalry | NAHL | 25 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.440 | 0.1634 | 0.1676 | 0.4659 | 0.4780 |
| 2004-05 | Toledo IceDiggers | NAHL | 51 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 0.647 | 0.2403 | 0.2346 | 0.6851 | 0.6687 |
| 2005-06 | Alpena IceDiggers | NAHL | 21 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.714 | 0.2652 | 0.2457 | 0.7563 | 0.7007 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Curry | D3 | — | SR | 20 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 0.750 |
| 2008-09 | Curry | D3 | — | JR | 20 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 1.550 |
| 2007-08 | Curry | D3 | — | SO | 25 | 13 | 19 | 32 | 1.280 |
| 2006-07 | Curry | D3 | — | FR | 26 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 1.308 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.