← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt McCann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-20 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Toronto Metro Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 6 22 28 0.583 0.1430 0.1438 0.4016 0.4037
2007-08 OJHL 39 2 7 9 0.231 0.0566 0.0543 0.1589 0.1526
2008-09 OJHL 52 30 27 57 1.096 0.2687 0.2442 0.7547 0.6859
2011-12 Toronto Metro Univ. USports-M 8 2 2 4 0.500 0.2638 0.2544 1.4655 1.4132
2012-13 Toronto Metro Univ. USports-M 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.1319 0.1211 0.7328 0.6729
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 7 1 0 1 0.143
2009-10 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 19 1 11 12 0.632
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2009-10 · Norwich
+338.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26720
Forward overall
#908
Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2011-12
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.