IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 8 7 4 11 1.375 0.1726 0.1831 0.4341 0.4606
2013-14 — NA3HL 40 10 25 35 0.875 0.1098 0.1122 0.2762 0.2823
2014-15 Cincinnati Swords NA3HL 41 19 16 35 0.854 0.1071 0.1042 0.2695 0.2623
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 32 6 9 15 0.469 0.1722 0.1613 0.4948 0.4634
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 15 3 6 9 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2016-17 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+406.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22266
Forward overall
#839
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Stevens
Plymouth State · 2008-09
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Ott
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Bistodeau
Hobart · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.