← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Bistodeau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Mexico Mustangs NAHL 54 3 5 8 0.148 0.0544 0.0590 0.1563 0.1695
2012-13 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.1050 0.1086 0.3016 0.3120
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 22 5 17 22 1.000 0.2807 0.2672 0.8222 0.7826
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Hobart D1 SUNYAC SR 14 3 6 9 0.643
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 14 3 6 9 0.643
2017-18 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 6 0 3 3 0.500
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 18 3 8 11 0.611
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 13 1 5 6 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2015-16 · Hobart
+164.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30013
Forward overall
#1155
Forward born in 1994
#2699
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.