IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Bistodeau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Mexico Mustangs NAHL 54 3 5 8 0.148 0.0550 0.0597 0.1568 0.1701
2012-13 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.1061 0.1098 0.3025 0.3129
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 22 5 17 22 1.000 0.3003 0.2858 0.8237 0.7840
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 14 3 6 9 0.643
2017-18 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 6 0 3 3 0.500
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 18 3 8 11 0.611
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 13 1 5 6 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2015-16 · Hobart
+150.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20325
Forward overall
#812
Forward born in 1994
#1945
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jarrett Cammarata
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.