← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Ott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 29 8 17 25 0.862 0.1160 0.1160 0.2935 0.2935
2021-22 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 38 28 16 44 1.158 0.1559 0.1446 0.3941 0.3654
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 17 1 3 4 0.235
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29623
Forward overall
#1177
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.