| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Brockville Braves | CCHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Brockville Braves | CCHL | 49 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.306 | 0.0664 | 0.0667 | 0.2368 | 0.2377 |
| 2012-13 | Brockville Braves | CCHL | 58 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 0.431 | 0.0935 | 0.0897 | 0.3335 | 0.3200 |
| 2013-14 | Brockville Braves | CCHL | 59 | 18 | 25 | 43 | 0.729 | 0.1581 | 0.1439 | 0.5639 | 0.5131 |
| 2016-17 | Carleton Univ. | USports-M | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.1319 | 0.1271 | 0.7328 | 0.7059 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | — | 17 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.647 |
| 2014-15 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | — | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.