| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Hamilton Red Wings | OJHL | 30 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.100 | 0.0279 | 0.0297 | 0.0690 | 0.0733 |
| 2011-12 | Hamilton Red Wings | OJHL | 46 | 3 | 19 | 22 | 0.478 | 0.1336 | 0.1361 | 0.3301 | 0.3362 |
| 2012-13 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 55 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.218 | 0.1389 | 0.1324 | 0.6539 | 0.6231 |
| 2013-14 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 40 | 8 | 27 | 35 | 0.875 | 0.2497 | 0.2298 | 0.6773 | 0.6232 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | SR | 27 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.259 |
| 2016-17 | Lake Superior State | D1 | WCHA | JR | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.167 |
| 2015-16 | Lake Superior State | D1 | WCHA | SO | 32 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.250 |
| 2014-15 | Lake Superior State | D1 | WCHA | FR | 37 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.297 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.