← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Roll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-06-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 30 0 3 3 0.100 0.0279 0.0297 0.0690 0.0733
2011-12 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 46 3 19 22 0.478 0.1336 0.1361 0.3301 0.3362
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 55 4 8 12 0.218 0.1389 0.1324 0.6539 0.6231
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 40 8 27 35 0.875 0.2497 0.2298 0.6773 0.6232
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Niagara D1 AHA SR 27 1 6 7 0.259
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 12 1 1 2 0.167
2015-16 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 32 1 7 8 0.250
2014-15 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 37 1 10 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2014-15 · Lake Superior State
+65.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4672
Defenseman overall
#816
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2015-16
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.