IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Roll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-06-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 30 0 3 3 0.100 0.0245 0.0260 0.0689 0.0732
2011-12 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 46 3 19 22 0.478 0.1172 0.1194 0.3293 0.3354
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 55 4 8 12 0.218 0.1287 0.1226 0.6553 0.6245
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 40 8 27 35 0.875 0.1898 0.1746 0.6770 0.6229
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Niagara D1 AHA SR 27 1 6 7 0.259
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 12 1 1 2 0.167
2015-16 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 32 1 7 8 0.250
2014-15 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 37 1 10 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2014-15 · Lake Superior State
+104.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6742
Defenseman overall
#966
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mathieu MacMillan
Utica · 2024-25
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Isherwood
Curry · 2024-25
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Krapian
Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.