IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donovan Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 63 5 10 15 0.238 0.0610 0.0665 0.1795 0.1957
2002-03 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 41 4 9 13 0.317 0.0812 0.0842 0.2390 0.2477
2003-04 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 60 20 26 46 0.767 0.1964 0.1942 0.5779 0.5713
2004-05 Estevan Bruins SJHL 42 12 18 30 0.714 0.1830 0.1719 0.5384 0.5058
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Neumann D3 MAC SR 30 3 9 12 0.400
2007-08 Neumann D3 MAC JR 20 1 0 1 0.050
2006-07 Neumann D3 MAC SO 22 3 4 7 0.318
2005-06 Neumann D3 MAC FR 19 7 6 13 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2005-06 · Neumann
+342.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29147
Forward overall
#839
Forward born in 1984
#543
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Fuss
University of New England · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Savva Smirnov
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Brausen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.