IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donovan Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 63 5 10 15 0.238 0.0688 0.0750 0.1792 0.1954
2002-03 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 41 4 9 13 0.317 0.0916 0.0949 0.2387 0.2474
2003-04 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 60 20 26 46 0.767 0.2215 0.2190 0.5772 0.5706
2004-05 Estevan Bruins SJHL 42 12 18 30 0.714 0.2064 0.1939 0.5377 0.5051
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Neumann D3 — SR 30 3 9 12 0.400
2007-08 Neumann D3 — JR 20 1 0 1 0.050
2006-07 Neumann D3 — SO 22 3 4 7 0.318
2005-06 Neumann D3 — FR 19 7 6 13 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2005-06 · Neumann
+291.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22170
Forward overall
#764
Forward born in 1984
#684
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Fuss
New England · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Brausen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Michalchuk
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.