IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lukas Ciotti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 47 8 8 16 0.340 0.0834 0.0883 0.2344 0.2481
2008-09 — OJHL 45 10 15 25 0.556 0.1362 0.1372 0.3825 0.3853
2009-10 Bramalea Blues OJHL 54 31 46 77 1.426 0.3495 0.3337 0.9817 0.9373
2010-11 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 28 29 57 1.188 0.2911 0.2644 0.8176 0.7425
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA — 23 7 11 18 0.783
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA — 18 7 7 14 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2011-12 · Adrian
+211.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13142
Forward overall
#529
Forward born in 1990
#342
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Melligan
Buffalo State · 2010-11
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kimball
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Garnier
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.