IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — CCHL 58 9 20 29 0.500 0.1085 0.1054 0.3869 0.3757
2012-13 Cornwall Colts CCHL 56 9 15 24 0.429 0.0930 0.0862 0.3316 0.3073
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 23 0 5 5 0.217
2016-17 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 20 0 1 1 0.050
2015-16 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 15 9 10 19 1.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.27
2013-14 · Fitchburg State
+1475.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37518
Forward overall
#1414
Forward born in 1992
#945
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Frédéric D'Amours
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.