← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leo Bacallao Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Madison Capitols USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Madison Capitols USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 NAHL 37 8 9 17 0.460 0.1706 0.1706 0.4865 0.4865
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 10 2 2 4 0.400 0.1485 0.1485 0.4235 0.4235
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 56 24 22 46 0.821 0.3050 0.2935 0.8697 0.8368
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SR 26 12 9 21 0.808
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 22 6 6 12 0.545
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 28 9 13 22 0.786
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 24 7 9 16 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+152.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17258
Forward overall
#583
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.