← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Spink Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Cornwall Colts CCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Cornwall Colts CCHL 56 7 18 25 0.446 0.1274 0.1442 0.3456 0.3911
2013-14 Cornwall Colts CCHL 59 18 19 37 0.627 0.1790 0.1936 0.4854 0.5251
2014-15 Cornwall Colts CCHL 36 8 16 24 0.667 0.1903 0.1971 0.5161 0.5345
2015-16 Cornwall Colts CCHL 62 18 38 56 0.903 0.2578 0.2545 0.6992 0.6903
2016-17 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 21 32 53 0.930 0.2654 0.2481 0.7198 0.6729
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 JR 25 3 10 13 0.520
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SO 27 4 11 15 0.556
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 FR 22 7 6 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2017-18 · SUNY Oswego
+175.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15037
Forward overall
#600
Forward born in 1996
#371
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.