← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Spink Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Cornwall Colts CCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Cornwall Colts CCHL 56 7 18 25 0.446 0.0968 0.1095 0.3454 0.3909
2013-14 Cornwall Colts CCHL 59 18 19 37 0.627 0.1360 0.1471 0.4852 0.5249
2014-15 Cornwall Colts CCHL 36 8 16 24 0.667 0.1446 0.1498 0.5158 0.5342
2015-16 Cornwall Colts CCHL 62 18 38 56 0.903 0.1959 0.1934 0.6988 0.6900
2016-17 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 21 32 53 0.930 0.2017 0.1886 0.7194 0.6725
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Oswego D1 JR 25 3 10 13 0.520
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 25 3 10 13 0.520
2018-19 Oswego D1 SO 27 4 11 15 0.556
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 27 4 11 15 0.556
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 22 7 6 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2017-18 · SUNY Oswego
+262.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18573
Forward overall
#727
Forward born in 1996
#300
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.