← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zac Boyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 40 13 19 32 0.800 0.0738 0.0777 0.1832 0.1928
2015-16 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 25 13 23 36 1.440 0.1329 0.1336 0.3298 0.3316
2016-17 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 40 35 34 69 1.725 0.1592 0.1509 0.3950 0.3744
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Neumann D1 MAC SR 9 2 1 3 0.333
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC SR 9 2 1 3 0.333
2019-20 Neumann D1 MAC JR 26 7 17 24 0.923
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC JR 26 7 17 24 0.923
2018-19 Neumann D1 MAC SO 24 9 11 20 0.833
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC SO 24 9 11 20 0.833
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC FR 18 3 4 7 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2017-18 · Neumann
+215.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21391
Forward overall
#847
Forward born in 1996
#33
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2024-25
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.