IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zac Boyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 40 13 19 32 0.800 0.0959 0.1009 0.1837 0.1933
2015-16 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 25 13 23 36 1.440 0.1727 0.1736 0.3306 0.3324
2016-17 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 40 35 34 69 1.725 0.2068 0.1960 0.3961 0.3755
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC SR 9 2 1 3 0.333
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC JR 26 7 17 24 0.923
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC SO 24 9 11 20 0.833
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC FR 18 3 4 7 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2017-18 · Neumann
+142.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24299
Forward overall
#1019
Forward born in 1996
#37
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Degerness
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Mammas
Canton · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Lovisek
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.