← New Search ↗ Social Card

Talon Berlando Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-29 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Eatonia Huskies · SWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0671 0.0694
2005-06 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 59 5 10 15 0.254 0.0853 0.0842
2006-07 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 39 12 12 24 0.615 0.2064 0.1942
2014-15 Eatonia Huskies SWHL 14 6 5 11 0.786
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 30 12 14 26 0.867
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 14 10 24 0.889
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 30 11 18 29 0.967
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 23 1 13 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Superior
+373.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6228
Forward overall
#24
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2005-06
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.