IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Talon Berlando Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0671 0.0694 0.1851 0.1915
2005-06 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 59 5 10 15 0.254 0.0853 0.0842 0.2352 0.2321
2006-07 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 39 12 12 24 0.615 0.2064 0.1942 0.5695 0.5359
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 30 12 14 26 0.867
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 14 10 24 0.889
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 30 11 18 29 0.967
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 23 1 13 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Superior
+373.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39839
Forward overall
#1291
Forward born in 1986
#1501
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Valenti
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Walker
Albertus Magnus · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Gerum
Salve Regina · 2024-25
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.