| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Drumheller Dragons | AJHL | 45 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.200 | 0.0671 | 0.0694 | — | — |
| 2005-06 | Drumheller Dragons | AJHL | 59 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.254 | 0.0853 | 0.0842 | — | — |
| 2006-07 | Drumheller Dragons | AJHL | 39 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 0.615 | 0.2064 | 0.1942 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Eatonia Huskies | SWHL | 14 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.786 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | WIAC | SR | 30 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 0.867 |
| 2009-10 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | WIAC | JR | 27 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 0.889 |
| 2008-09 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | WIAC | SO | 30 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 0.967 |
| 2007-08 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | WIAC | FR | 23 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 0.609 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.