IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Niko Moulakelis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Chicago Bulldogs NA3HL 43 14 13 27 0.628 0.0694 0.0724 0.1989 0.2075
2015-16 Chicago Bulldogs NA3HL 11 3 2 5 0.455 0.0503 0.0500 0.1440 0.1432
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 40 16 19 35 0.875 0.1280 0.1244 0.4290 0.4171
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Chatham D1 — SR 11 4 3 7 0.636
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC — 11 4 3 7 0.636
2019-20 Chatham D1 — JR 17 7 8 15 0.882
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC — 17 7 8 15 0.882
2018-19 Trine D1 — SO 10 1 1 2 0.200
2018-19 Trine D3 NCHA — 10 1 1 2 0.200
2017-18 Trine D3 NCHA — 21 4 5 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2017-18 · Trine
+429.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27168
Forward overall
#1104
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blair Falotico
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Carmine Taffo
Trine · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Eppright
New England · 2016-17
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.