IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Terra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Hampton NE-Prep 13 5 4 9 0.692 0.1953 0.1953 0.3168 0.3168
2021-22 New Hampton NE-Prep 30 12 14 26 0.867 0.2445 0.2445 0.3966 0.3966
2022-23 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 39 25 26 51 1.308 0.4310 0.4308 0.4449 0.4447
2023-24 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 51 28 21 49 0.961 0.5357 0.5130 0.7769 0.7440
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 25 4 10 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2025-26 · Elmira
+36.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7340
Forward overall
#273
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kim Hilmersson
Plymouth State · 2024-25
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.