IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teddy Purcell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-09-08 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Avangard Omsk · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 51 21 25 46 0.902 0.2606 0.2741 0.6790 0.7141
2004-05 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 58 20 47 67 1.155 0.7356 0.7204 3.4618 3.3901
2005-06 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 19 52 71 1.291 0.8220 0.7619 3.8684 3.5856
2017-18 Avangard Omsk KHL 21 3 9 12 0.571 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 20 8 3 11 0.550
2006-07 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 40 16 27 43 1.075
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.69
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2006-07 · Maine
+54.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#809
Forward overall
#26
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.87 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.