Teddy Purcell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-09-08 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2003-04	Notre Dame Hounds	SJHL	51	21	25	46	0.902	0.2311	0.2431	0.6799	0.7151
2004-05	Cedar Rapids RoughRiders	USHL	58	20	47	67	1.155	0.6815	0.6674	3.4695	3.3977
2005-06	Cedar Rapids RoughRiders	USHL	55	19	52	71	1.291	0.7615	0.7058	3.8771	3.5936
2017-18	Avangard Omsk	KHL	21	3	9	12	0.571	1.4285	1.0785	7.8731	5.9439

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2023-24	SUNY Geneseo	D3	SUNYAC	FR	20	8	3	11	0.550
2006-07	Maine	D1	HockeyEast	FR	40	16	27	43	1.075

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.64

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.07

2006-07 · Maine

+67.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 20 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1289

Forward overall

#50

Forward born in 1985

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.