IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Park Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-08-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Burlington Cougars OJHL 32 9 13 22 0.688 0.1685 0.1780 0.4733 0.4999
2005-06 Burlington Cougars OJHL 28 8 6 14 0.500 0.1226 0.1250 0.3443 0.3510
2006-07 Burlington Cougars OJHL 30 18 14 32 1.067 0.2614 0.2534 0.7344 0.7119
2007-08 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 10 11 6 17 1.700 0.2839 0.2669 0.7077 0.6654
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC — 24 13 10 23 0.958
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC — 19 5 3 8 0.421
2009-10 Neumann D3 MAC — 22 7 11 18 0.818
2008-09 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 25 11 8 19 0.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2008-09 · Buffalo State
+239.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14404
Forward overall
#496
Forward born in 1987
#428
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Mannarn
King's · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Culbertson
Castleton · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Kingston
Utica · 2004-05
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.