IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Routledge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Toronto Patriots OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Milton Menace OJHL 53 8 17 25 0.472 0.1318 0.1342 0.3255 0.3314
2016-17 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 54 11 31 42 0.778 0.2173 0.2115 0.5368 0.5226
2017-18 — OJHL 51 19 37 56 1.098 0.3068 0.2839 0.7577 0.7012
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Canton D3 — SO 25 6 8 14 0.560
2018-19 Canton D3 — FR 21 4 9 13 0.619
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2018-19 · Canton
+183.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15804
Forward overall
#644
Forward born in 1997
#1003
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Duston Hebebrand
Adrian · 2010-11
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Keizer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.