← New Search ↗ Social Card

Payton Schaly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Aurora Tigers OJHL 30 5 4 9 0.300 0.0838 0.0901 0.2070 0.2225
2019-20 OJHL 45 18 15 33 0.733 0.2049 0.2049 0.5061 0.5061
2020-21 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 6 3 6 9 1.500 0.2019 0.2019
2021-22 OJHL 39 18 18 36 0.923 0.2579 0.2396 0.6370 0.5918
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 21 12 11 23 1.095
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 15 0 8 8 0.533
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 29 8 6 14 0.483
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 25 10 9 19 0.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2022-23 · Plymouth State
+393.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20058
Forward overall
#697
Forward born in 2001
#1491
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2021-22
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.