IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Kuzyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-06-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Southeast Blades MJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0642 0.0695 0.2106 0.2280
2004-05 — BCHL 61 12 23 35 0.574 0.2211 0.2283 0.8345 0.8616
2005-06 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 56 13 28 41 0.732 0.2455 0.2402 0.6773 0.6626
2006-07 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 60 22 35 57 0.950 0.3186 0.2970 0.8789 0.8194
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA — 29 11 7 18 0.621
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2010-11 · Adrian
+164.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19630
Forward overall
#658
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Becker
Utica · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hassan Akl
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.