← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Fortin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.1155 0.1230 0.2446 0.2605
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 47 7 9 16 0.340 0.1388 0.1391 0.2724 0.2730
2018-19 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 39 24 22 46 1.179 0.1548 0.1453 0.4004 0.3759
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 22 12 14 26 1.182
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 24 13 14 27 1.125
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC FR 26 5 8 13 0.500
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 26 5 8 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2019-20 · Fitchburg State
+308.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15178
Forward overall
#707
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.