| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Boston Jr. Bandits | EHL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.1155 | 0.1230 | 0.2447 | 0.2606 |
| 2017-18 | Boston Jr. Bandits | NCDC | 47 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.340 | 0.1388 | 0.1391 | 0.2736 | 0.2742 |
| 2018-19 | Bridgewater Jr. Bandits | USPHL-Premier | 39 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 1.179 | 0.1543 | 0.1449 | 0.4003 | 0.3758 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Fitchburg State | D3 | MASCAC | — | 22 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 1.182 |
| 2021-22 | Fitchburg State | D3 | MASCAC | — | 24 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 1.125 |
| 2019-20 | Fitchburg State | D1 | MASCAC | FR | 26 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.500 |
| 2019-20 | Fitchburg State | D3 | MASCAC | — | 26 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.