IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Duston Hebebrand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 56 19 39 58 1.036 0.2894 0.2810 0.7147 0.6940
2010-11 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 50 26 38 64 1.280 0.3576 0.3306 0.8833 0.8166
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 30 13 15 28 0.933
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 29 18 16 34 1.172
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 25 5 13 18 0.720
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 22 4 8 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2011-12 · Adrian
+105.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8579
Forward overall
#356
Forward born in 1990
#307
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Craner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Simons
Endicott · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Della Paolera
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.