← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Simons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 USPHL-Premier-Classic 34 8 14 22 0.647 0.1943 0.1979 0.5330 0.5428
2016-17 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 13 23 36 0.818 0.2457 0.2382 0.6740 0.6535
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE SR 3 3 3 6 2.000
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE JR 25 14 17 31 1.240
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE SO 27 4 8 12 0.444
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE FR 19 2 17 19 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2017-18 · Endicott
+426.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17282
Forward overall
#713
Forward born in 1996
#73
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.