IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Keizer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 56 13 12 25 0.446 0.1497 0.1562 0.4131 0.4310
2009-10 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 45 12 11 23 0.511 0.1714 0.1701 0.4730 0.4693
2010-11 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 60 17 22 39 0.650 0.2180 0.2049 0.6015 0.5652
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 29 15 16 31 1.069
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2011-12 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+553.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30738
Forward overall
#1123
Forward born in 1990
#972
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Schrotenboer
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Park
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kent Bostrom
Bethel · 2004-05
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.