IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kent Bostrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Billings Bulls NAHL 47 27 22 49 1.043 0.3831 0.3793 1.1005 1.0895
2004-05 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 59 9 18 27 0.458 0.2699 0.2503 1.3744 1.2748
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 25 11 22 33 1.320
2007-08 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 25 11 20 31 1.240
2006-07 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 29 9 11 20 0.690
2005-06 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 27 18 15 33 1.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.22
2005-06 · Bethel
+373.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12961
Forward overall
#398
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Saini
Adrian · 2023-24
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Nesper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.