IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kent Bostrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Billings Bulls NAHL 47 27 22 49 1.043 0.3871 0.3832 1.1039 1.0929
2004-05 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 59 9 18 27 0.458 0.2914 0.2703 1.3713 1.2719
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bethel D3 — SR 25 11 22 33 1.320
2007-08 Bethel D3 — JR 25 11 20 31 1.240
2006-07 Bethel D3 — SO 29 9 11 20 0.690
2005-06 Bethel D3 — FR 27 18 15 33 1.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.22
2005-06 · Bethel
+352.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8488
Forward overall
#292
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Nesper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.