| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 56 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.339 | 0.1321 | 0.1327 | 0.4948 | 0.4971 |
| 2013-14 | — | NAHL | 27 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.074 | 0.0275 | 0.0266 | 0.0785 | 0.0761 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | St. Olaf | D3 | MIAC | SR | 24 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.125 |
| 2016-17 | St. Olaf | D3 | MIAC | JR | 25 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.080 |
| 2015-16 | St. Olaf | D3 | MIAC | SO | 22 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.182 |
| 2014-15 | St. Olaf | D3 | MIAC | FR | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.