← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Lukenda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 56 5 14 19 0.339 0.1321 0.1327 0.4948 0.4971
2013-14 NAHL 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0275 0.0266 0.0785 0.0761
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 24 2 1 3 0.125
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 25 1 1 2 0.080
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 22 0 4 4 0.182
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 19 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#46027
Forward overall
#1843
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2014-15
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2002-03
0.080 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.