IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 38 1 9 10 0.263 0.0565 0.0552 0.1289 0.1260
2015-16 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 32 1 17 18 0.562 0.1207 0.1127 0.2755 0.2572
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 28 1 4 5 0.179
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 25 2 1 3 0.120
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 22 0 3 3 0.136
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 25 0 7 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2016-17 · Stevenson
+230.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13106
Defenseman overall
#1694
Defenseman born in 1995
#1240
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Millis
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew McCann
Adrian · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
P.A. Martineau
Hobart · 2017-18
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.