IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Millis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 48 7 9 16 0.333 0.1238 0.1251 0.3529 0.3565
2009-10 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 17 6 3 9 0.529 0.1966 0.1907 0.5605 0.5437
2010-11 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 48 14 17 31 0.646 0.2398 0.2204 0.6838 0.6285
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 26 5 9 14 0.538
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SO 7 1 1 2 0.286
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#20270
Forward overall
#837
Forward born in 1990
#1931
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Beaudoin
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Nolan
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Laidlaw
Utica · 2005-06
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.