IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Nolan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 42 22 20 42 1.000 0.2146 0.1992 0.4897 0.4547
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 — SR 23 5 7 12 0.522
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 — JR 24 8 7 15 0.625
2015-16 SUNY Cortland D3 — SO 23 6 5 11 0.478
2014-15 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 24 10 5 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2014-15 · SUNY Cortland
+266.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18430
Forward overall
#701
Forward born in 1993
#145
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Ella
Nichols · 2007-08
0.828 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Crowe
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.