IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Nolan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 42 22 20 42 1.000 0.2310 0.2145 0.4893 0.4543
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 23 5 7 12 0.522
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 24 8 7 15 0.625
2015-16 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 23 6 5 11 0.478
2014-15 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 24 10 5 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2014-15 · SUNY Cortland
+240.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12183
Forward overall
#455
Forward born in 1993
#144
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Ella
Nichols · 2007-08
0.828 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Stansik
Adrian · 2006-07
1.172 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.