IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Stansik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 49 2 11 13 0.265 0.1565 0.1565 0.7961 0.7962
2005-06 — USHL 57 4 9 13 0.228 0.1346 0.1276 0.6845 0.6487
2006-07 Lincoln Stars USHL 44 2 15 17 0.386 0.2279 0.2043 1.1595 1.0393
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 27 5 26 31 1.148
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 28 8 30 38 1.357
2008-09 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 29 9 23 32 1.103
2007-08 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 29 11 23 34 1.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.17
2007-08 · Adrian
+615.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7612
Defenseman overall
#989
Defenseman born in 1986
#3044
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Wineman
Gustavus Adolphus · 2023-24
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Miller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.