IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Ella Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 50 7 7 14 0.280 0.1090 0.1104 0.4083 0.4136
2006-07 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 59 11 12 23 0.390 0.1517 0.1455 0.5684 0.5453
2007-08 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 40 10 12 22 0.550 0.1537 0.1377 0.3796 0.3400
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Nichols D3 CNE SR 27 9 6 15 0.556
2010-11 Nichols D3 CNE JR 24 11 8 19 0.792
2009-10 Nichols D3 — SO 26 6 13 19 0.731
2008-09 Nichols D3 — FR 29 8 16 24 0.828
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2008-09 · Nichols
+586.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28921
Forward overall
#1116
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marco Iozzo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon MacKinnon
Concordia Wisconsin · 2017-18
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Miles
Salem State · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.