| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Alberni Valley Bulldogs | BCHL | 50 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.280 | 0.1079 | 0.1093 | 0.4075 | 0.4128 |
| 2006-07 | Alberni Valley Bulldogs | BCHL | 59 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 0.390 | 0.1502 | 0.1441 | 0.5673 | 0.5442 |
| 2007-08 | Georgetown Raiders | OJHL | 40 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 0.550 | 0.1348 | 0.1207 | 0.3787 | 0.3392 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Nichols | D3 | CNE | SR | 27 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 0.556 |
| 2010-11 | Nichols | D3 | CNE | JR | 24 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.792 |
| 2009-10 | Nichols | D3 | CNE | SO | 26 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0.731 |
| 2008-09 | Nichols | D3 | CNE | FR | 29 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0.828 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.