IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Luiten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — BCHL 48 8 9 17 0.354 0.1365 0.1381 0.5155 0.5214
2011-12 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 23 27 50 0.833 0.2795 0.2686 0.7711 0.7411
2012-13 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 32 6 15 21 0.656 0.2201 0.2002 0.6072 0.5524
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC SR 27 14 14 28 1.037
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC JR 18 6 2 8 0.444
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC SO 26 5 10 15 0.577
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC FR 26 10 8 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2013-14 · Neumann
+255.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23774
Forward overall
#876
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Yearsley
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Landon Adams
Beloit · 2024-25
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Newpower
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.