IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Luiten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — BCHL 48 8 9 17 0.354 0.1379 0.1395 0.5165 0.5224
2011-12 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 23 27 50 0.833 0.2783 0.2675 0.7736 0.7435
2012-13 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 32 6 15 21 0.656 0.2192 0.1994 0.6092 0.5542
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC SR 27 14 14 28 1.037
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC JR 18 6 2 8 0.444
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC SO 26 5 10 15 0.577
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC FR 26 10 8 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2013-14 · Neumann
+256.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16080
Forward overall
#682
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Yearsley
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Newpower
Saint Mary's · 2022-23
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cass
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.