IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Laidlaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 48 15 6 21 0.438 0.1703 0.1861 0.6380 0.6972
2002-03 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 50 10 8 18 0.360 0.1401 0.1470 0.5250 0.5510
2003-04 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 37 5 12 17 0.460 0.1788 0.1797 0.6701 0.6735
2004-05 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 47 13 21 34 0.723 0.2815 0.2698 1.0549 1.0111
2005-06 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 59 18 30 48 0.814 0.3167 0.2877 1.1865 1.0777
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Utica D3 — FR 21 8 8 16 0.762
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2006-07 · Utica
+217.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12420
Forward overall
#452
Forward born in 1985
#1003
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Black
SUNY Potsdam · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Stewart
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Reed
Curry · 2010-11
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.