← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Phee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-12-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Canmore Eagles AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Canmore Eagles AJHL 47 10 7 17 0.362 0.1213 0.1342 0.3347 0.3702
2010-11 Canmore Eagles AJHL 34 8 9 17 0.500 0.1677 0.1767 0.4627 0.4875
2011-12 Canmore Eagles AJHL 46 17 16 33 0.717 0.2406 0.2413 0.6639 0.6658
2012-13 Canmore Eagles AJHL 43 20 14 34 0.791 0.2652 0.2523 0.7317 0.6962
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 25 9 11 20 0.800
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 23 9 10 19 0.826
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 25 4 5 9 0.360
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 23 3 3 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2013-14 · St. Scholastica
+23.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23731
Forward overall
#873
Forward born in 1992
#632
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2008-09
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.