IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tory Allan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-12-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 48 6 9 15 0.312 0.0903 0.0964 0.2353 0.2513
2007-08 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 52 15 16 31 0.596 0.1722 0.1750 0.4488 0.4561
2008-09 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 55 28 25 53 0.964 0.2784 0.2690 0.7254 0.7009
2009-10 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 28 10 21 31 1.107
2011-12 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 29 11 9 20 0.690
2010-11 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 27 7 4 11 0.407
2009-10 Norwich D3 — FR 18 8 5 13 0.722
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2009-10 · Norwich
+264.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19969
Forward overall
#828
Forward born in 1988
#547
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Beatty
Endicott · 2018-19
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
P.A. Martineau
Hobart · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.